Blogs

It seems that in this super modern age of bridge the low-level penalty double is obsolete. But surely most of us still play that a double of a weak 1NT opening as basically a PENALTY double? What do you need to double a 1NT opening? I go along with the theory that if you have a better hand than the 1NT opener, you should double. If you're playing ACOL opponents that means at least FIFTEEN high card points if your hand is balanced, or seven reasonably certain tricks, e.g. a solid suit and an outside entry. But let's just stick to the “15+” one for now.

Board 13 From Thursday 22/02/2018
Dealer N ALL Vul

	9764 A9 QT762 76
J32 QJT74 54 J52		Q85 K52 A98 KQT3
	AKT 863 KJ3 A984

As long as you know how to bid a slam, there is usually no need to bid a grand slam in a normal match-point session, especially on club nights. But nevertheless does it not feel great when you do bid and make a grand slam? I believe that this one is biddable no matter what system you employ.

Board 27 from Thursday 08/02/2018
Dealer S Nil Vul

	A AKT532 AKQ52 K
T865 J94 73 Q876		QJ32 87 JT64 JT3
	K974 Q6 98 A9542

This one is worth documenting for a number of reasons. I hope it will be of interest to all readers, not just those who played on Friday afternoon.
Board 5 from Friday 02/02/2018
Dealer N NS Vul

	K7 JT4 KQT983 93
T932 Q732 KQJT5		AJ8654 AK9 542 8
	Q 865 AJ76 A7642

This time, I had a different pair to keep my eye on. The session result was mid fifties, but they scored well on this deal, thanks to opponents not playing Acol and South not opening 1NT.

Board 11 from Thursday 25/01/18
Dealer S Nil Vul

	QJ32 A974 52 AJ8
T7 Q3 AQ743 T643		9864 KJ5 JT96 Q5
	AK5 T862 K8 K972

In my final Wednesday Review I set an opening lead problem. That is the sort of thing that I will be concentrating on in all my Thursday Reviews.
Whereas the Wednesday reviews were mainly about basic bidding and only a modicum relating to declarer play and defence, the Thursday reviews will be much more about declarer play and defence.