Never underestimate the power of a freakish fit

Those EW pairs who were prepared to bid their diamond fit to the max did well.

Board 17 from Thursday 10/05/2018
Dealer N Nil Vul

AQ74
AQ96
KJT52
85
J85
AQT872
64
932
K2
J96543
A8
KJT6
T743
K
Q973

Who Dares Wins!

Do you go to the bridge club to compete, or just sit there and watch the opponents play the hand? This deal is a great one for those pairs who like to compete ... even when they don't have their normal requirement of high card points. With distributional hands there is a guideline for when you have a legitimate opening bid (the 'rule of 20'): But does that mean that you are not allowed to open the East hand? The “20” rule is a guideline, not a law that cannot be broken. Look at the East hand in the following deal:

Board 10 from Thursday 3/05/2018.
Dealer E All Vul

7543
AQ7
T2
QT72
AJ
T9863
K5
A643
T2
KJ542
AQ73
95
KQ986
J9864
KJ8

1NT Action at the Hutt

A very ordinary 1NT opening by North on the following deal, but it led to a number of different, some very strange, results.

Board 9 from Thursday 26/04/2018.
Dealer N EW Vul

JT32
AT9
QT7
AKT
K9
K62
A98
QJ952
A85
J75
5432
763
Q764
Q843
KJ6
84

A Lolly Scramble

Why am I writing up board 18, the reader may be asking.

Let me ask you some questions

Thursday Review 13
There has to be more to opening a weak 1NT than just that. You need to have some arrangement with partner about how to bid further if necessary. As well as that, what to do when an opponent bids over your 1NT opening. And, of course, what YOU can do when an opponent opens 1NT. The results on this very normal looking board varied considerably, from 3H (NOT doubled!) by North to 4H by East down one.

Board 7 from Thursday 12/04/2018.
Dealer S All Vul

43
AQ952
Q42
Q52
AKJ
84
K873
KT86
986
KJT76
A5
A93
QT752
3
JT96
J74

PB + PD = PR

(Poor bidding and poor defence leads to poor results) .. in case you were wondering.
Board 8 from Thursday 5/04/2018
Dealer W Nil Vul

KQ876
873
JT854
5
9642
A62
AK962
93
AJT87
KJ54
Q3
AJT42
KQ53
QT9
7

Free Gravis and for Nothing

Have you ever been dealt a hand with 28 high card points? I bet you haven't - unless you were sitting South last Thursday. Such huge hands are not always that easy to bid, though. In fact they are notoriously difficult to bid to the optimum contract, as we can see when we look at the combined results in all our X-Clubs Thursday evening sessions.

Board 6 from Thursday 29/03/2018
Dealer E EW Vul

J65432
J3
532
92
Q9
T97654
T7
KQ7
87
Q82
9864
J843
AKT
AK
AKQJ
AT65

A Bonus 4441 Hand

I just had to add this one to the previous article because it was another 4441 hand that was very badly handled by all those at the table: at least in most cases that was so. The deal also requires better declarer play and defence than was evident in our Thursday session, maybe those aspects were better at other clubs. Let's take a look at:
Board 5 from Thursday 22/03/2018
Dealer N NS Vul

Q9
65
98543
KT92
A72
J7
72
AQJ865
KJT5
Q832
KQJT
4
8643
AKT94
A6
73

That old “4441” Syndrome

I wonder how many of the pairs that were overboard on this one tried to blame it on the “4441” syndrome? Amazing how many players find the 4441 hands difficult to bid to the optimum contract. Take a look at:
Board 3 from Thursday 22/03/2018
Dealer S NS Vul

KT8653
3
KT
KT62
QJ
T864
QJ72
Q75
A972
AQJ9
853
94
4
K752
A964
AJ83

Slam Dunk!

Lest you should think that I am too fixated on slams, let me assure you that I am. They are fun to bid and fun to play. But the main reason that I am writing this deal up is this: One week ago I wrote another chapter for “13 Tricks”. It involved bidding of very strong distributional hands, and I did not imagine for one moment that a very similar deal would occur at the club the very next week. Having read that chapter, the reader would have had little trouble arriving at the available grand slam, but only one of the nine pairs at our club did bid to it. Let's have a look:

Syndicate content