Blogs

Double Dummy 15

This defence should not have needed to be ‘double dummy’ but escaped quite a few NS pairs when East played in 4S after a competitive auction. I suggest that NS should bid to 4H and EW take the sacrifice in 4S, which should be doubled. But let’s not talk about the bidding because there are lessons to be learnt about defence.

Board 20 from Tuesday 5/02/24
Dealer W All Vul

J
T9853
AT86
A82
K642
KQJ
4
KQJ95
Q98753
7
Q52
763
AT
A642
KJ973
T4

David Asks About Handicaps

Davids QuestionDavids Question

The answer:

Double Dummy 14

The obsession with No Trumps has the potential to either win in a big way, or deservedly crash in flames. Why do so many bridge players have this obsession with bidding No Trump slams rather than the far easier to make minor suit slam? I don’t have a ready answer for that, but Deep Finesse does, because DF can see all the hands and knows that 7NT can be made by NS on this deal. So can 7D but 7D does not require the same virtually impossible layout that 7NT requires.

Board 19 from Wednesday 28/02/24
Dealer S EW Vul

A6
A964
KQ76
AJ7
J532
KQJT53
J9
5
T74
72
83
Q98642
KQ98
8
AT542
KT3

Double Dummy 13

What can we learn from Deep Finesse on the following deal?

Board 19 from Tuesday 20/02/24Dealer S EW Vul

763
K764
76
9843
AQ
A5
AT9853
752
J2
QJT32
QJ2
KQ6
KT9854
98
K4
AJT

Double Dummy 12

What can we learn, if anything, from this deal, which tells us that Deep Finesse can make 4S EW but not 4H! So, what’s the difference? When you see the deal for Board 5 you’ll see little difference between the hearts and spades: both have a 5-3 fit but there appear to be two heart losers and only one spade loser. Yet, DF says EW can make 4H but not 4S. Let’s see if we can work out why, then, 4H makes but not 4S.

Board 5 from Wednesday 14/02/24
Dealer N NS Vul

QJ7
QT9
KQ9
A952
A8543
A6432
Q73
KT6
J87
AJ5
KJ84
92
K5
T876432
T6

Double Dummy 11

This deal was reviewed in my previous article but wasn’t done explicitly enough and needs some more analysis.

Board 6 from Tuesday 30/01/24
Dealer E EW Vul

9
Q9742
T73
A985
KJT7653
J86
AQ
4
Q2
3
J9642
QJT32
A84
AKT5
K85
K76

Double Dummy 10

As South, how would you play 4H when West leads the four of clubs? Let’s say South has opened 1H and West has bid spades quite strongly. We can look at the full deal to make the problem into another double dummy one.

Board 6 from Tuesday 30/01/24
Dealer E EW Vul

9
Q9742
T73
A985
KJT7653
J86
AQ
4
Q2
3
J9642
QJT32
A84
AKT5
K85
K76

Double Dummy 09

Double dummy problems seldom arise in part score situations, because there are too many variations to go through, but this one is worth taking a look at.

Board 16 from Tuesday 23/01/24
Dealer W EW Vul

42
AK986
K75
K52
T973
Q53
QT93
J9
AKQ5
J2
AJ86
Q76
J86
T74
42
AT843

You are sitting West and North opens 1H and partner doubles. South bids 2H. Do you bid 2S or not?

Double Dummy 08

Few declarers made twelve tricks in a 4H contract on Board 18. Needless to say, there were none in 6H which can be made, if you have the help of Deep Finesse.
Board 18 from Wednesday 17/01/24
Dealer E NS Vul

KQ862
AK6
A432
T
AJ753
T2
QJ6
A72
T94
J53
T95
9843
Q9874
K87
KQJ65

Double Dummy 07

Monday X-Clubs provided this ‘double dummy’ problem The problem is: how does North end up in 2H after East opens a weak 1NT?

Board 10 from Monday 8/01/2024
Dealer E All Vul

T62
KQJ83
874
Q7
9875
54
KT63
K65
K3
A962
QJ52
A94
AQJ4
T7
A9
JT832

Syndicate content