Vil Gravis's blog

Double Dummy 21

This is not a double dummy play problem but more about bidding, featuring yet again what seems to be the constant shunning of the minor suit slam. It is true that in this deal, 3NT played by North and making overtricks would have scored over 80% so you might say, why worry about bidding any slams. At match points it is no big deal, but at teams, bidding the good slams can make a huge difference. But let’s see why a very good small slam (which makes an overtrick played double dummmy) was either too difficult to bid, or simply eschewed in favour of the easily bid 3NT.

Board 7 from Thursday 23/05/24
Dealer S All Vul

QT76
32
AJ2
AT54
J42
T7
QT86543
2
953
QJ985
K7
Q86
AK8
AK64
9
KJ973

OPENING LEADS - Chapter 4

Now let me give you some more opening lead problems. This exercise will be done in four parts, two opening lead problems each time.
You are once more WEST

a) Dealer South, EW VUL

SouthWestNorthEast
1NTPass2Pass
2Pass2NTPass
3NTPassPassPass

(1NT is 12-14)

Your hand:

AQ2
J973
JT
743

What would you lead?

OPENING LEADS - Which Suit, Which card?

Chapter 2: Which Suit, Which card?
The problems we saw earlier were not that difficult when you thought about them, were they? You had a clear indication of which suit to lead, and, hopefully the logical rules of ‘fourth highest’ or ‘ace when you have AK in your suit’ were good enough to get you off to the best start. There is a good reason why it is important to have a specific system and understanding of what each card led on the opening lead is trying to say, because partner needs to know that. So, let’s now take a look at what all the cards, from the ace down to the humble deuce, should generally mean to any partnership. Then, when the basic understandings are there, we can look at even more sophisticated ways we can use all of the thirteen cards we are dealt, be they aces and kings or little pip cards.

OPENING LEADS - Trumps, or No Trumps?

Chapter 1: Trumps, or No Trumps?
The first thing we must learn is that the opening lead against a NO TRUMP contract needs to be different from the opening lead against a TRUMP contract, for good reasons: If your opponents have chosen a suit as trumps, they have done so because they believe that they will have the advantage that whatever suit the defenders have strength and/or length in can not do any damage as long as the declaring side have trumps when they have no cards in the defenders’ suit or suits, in either dummy or declarer’s hand. That is what is known as ‘trump control’.

New Series: OPENING LEADS

Introduction: Some thoughts

Here are some things you may not know, or even have thought about, when you have begun on your wonderful journey in the game of bridge:

Double Dummy 20

Sometimes you get into trouble and in afterthought you see how you could have avoided the trouble by a ‘double dummy’ solution. This one is not exactly a ‘double dummy’ solution because it relates to bidding rather than play. But the lessons are nevertheless there.

Board 6 from Monday 15/04/24
Dealer E EW Vul

AKT976
A2
Q98
T8
J832
K853
JT52
K
5
QJ64
K63
A9432
Q4
T97
A74
QJ765

Double Dummy 19

Surprisingly few players seem to play suit preference signals, though they are not at all difficult to understand or make use of when required. Here is an example of the very basic suit preference signal, though in the actual deal, Deep Finesse would have made the contract despite the defenders’ use of the signal. Yes, the suit preference signal can also help declarer if declarer knows that that is what it is!

Board 8 from Friday 5/04/24
Dealer W Nil Vul

9
Q765
J742
QJ64
Q85
KJ942
KT8
K5
J732
83
AQ653
A9
AKT64
AT
9
T8732

Double Dummy 18

This deal from the archives is particularly significant to me because it was played in the days when we had no modern tools like computer deals or Deep Finesse analyses. Back to the future about 40 years ago, but even in those days some of the players knew how to defend without the help of Deep Finesse. At least, I would like to think so.

Dealer West All Vul; Teams

982
A852
2
QT653
5
6
AQJT75
AKJ94
KQT63
QJT7
K96
2
AJ74
K943
843
87

This was the bidding in a teams match:

SouthWestNorthEast
-1Pass1
Pass3Pass3
Pass4Pass4
Pass5PassPass
Pass

What is the ONLY way for the defence to defeat 5D and why should the defenders defend that way?

Double Dummy 17

This deal comes from the archives because I had a question from one of my regular readers, Sam, who asked about opening leads of singleton trumps. He has heard me say often enough that the lead of a singleton trump is one of the worst imaginable, because a) the first thing every declarer does when playing a hand is to draw trumps, so why do it for him and b) it is almost certain to solve any two way finesse problem if there is one. However, just to put it into context, I always add the proviso that there should always be a reason for doing what you do, especially when you make an opening lead, because the opening lead sets the scene for the rest of your defence, and the opening lead should tell your partner what you are hoping to achieve on defence. I then dug out this particular deal from my archives, a series I labelled “Ultimate Defence”. The reader may like to look at the deal and treat it as a double dummy problem before I continue the story in DD18.

Dealer West All Vul; Teams

982
A852
2
QT653
5
6
AQJT75
AKJ94
KQT63
QJT7
K96
2
AJ74
K943
843
87

Double Dummy 16

Most of the time, you shouldn’t need to be Deep Finesse to make the best opening lead. Nor should you have needed to have read some of my earlier articles stressing the need to have a full set of agreements with your partner as well a full repertoire of opening leads, including the opening lead of the ACE when holding specifically AKx or AQx against a No Trump contract.

Board 11 from Thursday 14/03/24
Dealer S EW Vul

Q
32
K86
AJ98752
8752
AQ8
QT54
QT
JT96
KT654
97
63
AK43
J97
AJ32
K4

Syndicate content