These East-West hands were close to a slam, but should a slam have been bid or avoided, and how should the EW hands have been bid? Those are good questions that may not be easily answered, even after you see the full deal. The deal will also provide the reader with an excellent ‘double dummy’ problem.

Board 9 from Thursday 12-09-24
Dealer N EW Vul

	3 Q97 Q975 J8654
KJ876 K83 2 AKT7		AQ JT652 AKJT Q2
	T9542 A4 8643 93

Welcome to my new series, SLAMS. Slams is almost always part of the conversation after every session of bridge. So it seems, by popular demand, I just have to do this. Hopefully this series will interest slam fans and suggest how to bid them, as well as how not to bid them, and how to make them when you manage to bid them. Board 12 from Wednesday 28/8/24 should provide us all with the inspiration to always look for the Mt. Everest of bridge, the Grand Slam.

Board 12 from Wednesday 28/8/24
Dealer West NS Vul

	83 98764 QJ86 94
A5 J2 732 AKJ732		KQT97642 A5 AK5
	J KQT3 T94 QT865

This deal presents a difficult bidding problem, and when the bidding problem was solved, a not so difficult problem for declarer that was nevertheless not solved by every declarer. And when the bidding problem was not solved and the NS pairs ended up in an inferior 3NT, many EW pairs still failed to take advantage of their luck by letting declarer make the unmakeable 3NT.

Board 21 from Thursday 15/08/24
Dealer N NS Vul

	4 7 AKT62 AKT852
KT82 KQT5 J975 4		J65 J9832 Q4 Q73
	AQ973 A64 83 J96

This session was played as Swiss Pairs at the Hutt Club, so maybe a direct comparison of results across all of X-Clubs may not reflect how the bidding and play should, or might go. But let’s take a look anyway as there are important lessons to learn if you are going to develop a good understanding as a partnership.

Board 24 from Thursday 9/08/24
Dlr West Nil Vul

	T43 T8762 2 8632
AQJ9852 KJ64 J5		6 AKQ95 AT8 AQT9
	K7 J43 Q9753 K74

Is taking a risk at match points warranted when there could be more to gain than to lose? And the same can apply to teams play though of course there is much more to gain and to lose if you get it wrong. In a match point game, as in the following deal, it was just one board, and the total match points at stake were the equivalent of 4% for the session, to make it easier for the reader to relate to the narrative.

Board 3 from Friday 2/08/24
Dlr South EW Vul

	JT6 AJ87 T842 53
K873 6542 J753 9		954 KQT AKQ96 T2
	AQ2 93 AKQJ8764