Session: Week 38 Thursday 38thu.:
Full report for
Jim Brough
and
Margot Brough
| Final position: | 2 |
| Score: | 3567.5
matchpoints (56.64%)
|
| You were: | Pair 17104 |
If you hover the cursor above pair number in the scoresheet table
you will see players' names in the highlight
Board 1 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | -300 |
| Earning you: | 216
matchpoints (76.06%)
|
| You played against: | Megan Bruynel and
John Barton |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
3000.3
matchpoints (47.64%)
|
Board 2 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | -450 |
| Earning you: | 76.1
matchpoints (26.8%)
|
| You played against: | Megan Bruynel and
John Barton |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
3000.3
matchpoints (47.64%)
|
Board 3 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -630 |
| Earning you: | 207.9
matchpoints (73.2%)
|
| You played against: | Megan Bruynel and
John Barton |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
3000.3
matchpoints (47.64%)
|
Board 4 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | 630 |
| Earning you: | 105.5
matchpoints (37.15%)
|
| You played against: | Marg Lees and
Keith Lees |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
3457.5
matchpoints (54.55%)
|
Board 5 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 990 |
| Earning you: | 282
matchpoints (99.3%)
|
| You played against: | Marg Lees and
Keith Lees |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
3457.5
matchpoints (54.55%)
|
Board 6 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -510 |
| Earning you: | 194.7
matchpoints (68.56%)
|
| You played against: | Marg Lees and
Keith Lees |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
3457.5
matchpoints (54.55%)
|
Board 7 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | 130 |
| Earning you: | 109.5
matchpoints (38.56%)
|
| You played against: | Linzee Inkster and
Kay Matheson |
| who finished in position: | 8, with
2868.4
matchpoints (42.90%)
|
Board 8 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 50 |
| Earning you: | 234.3
matchpoints (82.5%)
|
| You played against: | Linzee Inkster and
Kay Matheson |
| who finished in position: | 8, with
2868.4
matchpoints (42.90%)
|
Board 9 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | 170 |
| Earning you: | 230.2
matchpoints (81.06%)
|
| You played against: | Linzee Inkster and
Kay Matheson |
| who finished in position: | 8, with
2868.4
matchpoints (42.90%)
|
Board 10 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | 100 |
| Earning you: | 269.8
matchpoints (95%)
|
| You played against: | Anthony Perkins and
Andrew Li |
| who finished in position: | 9, with
2680.8
matchpoints (42.57%)
|
Board 11 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | -170 |
| Earning you: | 85.2
matchpoints (30%)
|
| You played against: | Anthony Perkins and
Andrew Li |
| who finished in position: | 9, with
2680.8
matchpoints (42.57%)
|
Board 12 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 920 |
| Earning you: | 254.6
matchpoints (89.65%)
|
| You played against: | Anthony Perkins and
Andrew Li |
| who finished in position: | 9, with
2680.8
matchpoints (42.57%)
|
Board 16 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -120 |
| Earning you: | 131.9
matchpoints (48.16%)
|
| You played against: | Tina Connell-Pine and
Trevor Smith |
| who finished in position: | 7, with
2964.4
matchpoints (46.62%)
|
Board 17 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 420 |
| Earning you: | 146
matchpoints (53.3%)
|
| You played against: | Tina Connell-Pine and
Trevor Smith |
| who finished in position: | 7, with
2964.4
matchpoints (46.62%)
|
Board 18 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 200 |
| Earning you: | 259.8
matchpoints (94.85%)
|
| You played against: | Tina Connell-Pine and
Trevor Smith |
| who finished in position: | 7, with
2964.4
matchpoints (46.62%)
|
Board 19 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 65.5
matchpoints (23.91%)
|
| You played against: | Sara Enoka and
Yvonne Rowe |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
3828.3
matchpoints (60.50%)
|
Board 20 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 139
matchpoints (50.75%)
|
| You played against: | Sara Enoka and
Yvonne Rowe |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
3828.3
matchpoints (60.50%)
|
Board 21 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | -450 |
| Earning you: | 108.8
matchpoints (41.23%)
|
| You played against: | Sara Enoka and
Yvonne Rowe |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
3828.3
matchpoints (60.50%)
|
Board 22 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -110 |
| Earning you: | 40.6
matchpoints (15.4%)
|
| You played against: | John Luoni and
Chris Woods |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
3183.1
matchpoints (50.54%)
|
Board 23 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -140 |
| Earning you: | 64.5
matchpoints (24.44%)
|
| You played against: | John Luoni and
Chris Woods |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
3183.1
matchpoints (50.54%)
|
Board 24 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 85.6
matchpoints (32.44%)
|
| You played against: | John Luoni and
Chris Woods |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
3183.1
matchpoints (50.54%)
|
Board 25 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -50 |
| Earning you: | 173
matchpoints (74.57%)
|
| You played against: | Margaret Norrish and
Ian Nicholls |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
3045.6
matchpoints (48.36%)
|
Board 26 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -620 |
| Earning you: | 51
matchpoints (26.29%)
|
| You played against: | Margaret Norrish and
Ian Nicholls |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
3045.6
matchpoints (48.36%)
|
Board 27 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 140 |
| Earning you: | 36
matchpoints (94.74%)
|
| You played against: | Margaret Norrish and
Ian Nicholls |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
3045.6
matchpoints (48.36%)
|