Session: Week 28 Tuesday 28tued:
Full report for
Michele Hunt
and
Dean Smith
| Final position: | 8 |
| Score: | 1512.4
matchpoints (38.13%)
|
| You were: | Pair 12103 |
If you hover the cursor above pair number in the scoresheet table
you will see players' names in the highlight
Board 1 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 100 |
| Earning you: | 101.8
matchpoints (59.88%)
|
| You played against: | Stephen Searle and
Jane Searle |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
2447
matchpoints (61.70%)
|
Board 2 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | -630 |
| Earning you: | 11.6
matchpoints (6.82%)
|
| You played against: | Stephen Searle and
Jane Searle |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
2447
matchpoints (61.70%)
|
Board 3 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | 650 |
| Earning you: | 92.3
matchpoints (54.94%)
|
| You played against: | Stephen Searle and
Jane Searle |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
2447
matchpoints (61.70%)
|
Board 4 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -300 |
| Earning you: | 0
matchpoints (0%)
|
| You played against: | Stephen Searle and
Jane Searle |
| who finished in position: | 1, with
2447
matchpoints (61.70%)
|
Board 5 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 110 |
| Earning you: | 136.8
matchpoints (80.47%)
|
| You played against: | Lee Willetts and
Sue McKenzie |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
2152.2
matchpoints (54.27%)
|
Board 6 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | 140 |
| Earning you: | 25.9
matchpoints (15.24%)
|
| You played against: | Lee Willetts and
Sue McKenzie |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
2152.2
matchpoints (54.27%)
|
Board 7 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | 620 |
| Earning you: | 34.2
matchpoints (20.12%)
|
| You played against: | Lee Willetts and
Sue McKenzie |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
2152.2
matchpoints (54.27%)
|
Board 8 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | -50 |
| Earning you: | 43.6
matchpoints (25.65%)
|
| You played against: | Lee Willetts and
Sue McKenzie |
| who finished in position: | 3, with
2152.2
matchpoints (54.27%)
|
Board 9 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 28.4
matchpoints (16.91%)
|
| You played against: | Kathryn Coyle and
Rex Tulloch |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
1903.2
matchpoints (47.99%)
|
Board 10 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -660 |
| Earning you: | 13.7
matchpoints (8.16%)
|
| You played against: | Kathryn Coyle and
Rex Tulloch |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
1903.2
matchpoints (47.99%)
|
Board 11 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 50 |
| Earning you: | 83
matchpoints (49.4%)
|
| You played against: | Kathryn Coyle and
Rex Tulloch |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
1903.2
matchpoints (47.99%)
|
Board 12 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 480 |
| Earning you: | 95.2
matchpoints (56.7%)
|
| You played against: | Kathryn Coyle and
Rex Tulloch |
| who finished in position: | 5, with
1903.2
matchpoints (47.99%)
|
Board 13 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -200 |
| Earning you: | 25.9
matchpoints (15.24%)
|
| You played against: | Anne Wilson and
Julie Farrell |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
1862.7
matchpoints (46.97%)
|
Board 14 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 50 |
| Earning you: | 33.6
matchpoints (19.76%)
|
| You played against: | Anne Wilson and
Julie Farrell |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
1862.7
matchpoints (46.97%)
|
Board 15 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | 450 |
| Earning you: | 166.9
matchpoints (98.18%)
|
| You played against: | Anne Wilson and
Julie Farrell |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
1862.7
matchpoints (46.97%)
|
Board 16 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | 150 |
| Earning you: | 141
matchpoints (82.94%)
|
| You played against: | Anne Wilson and
Julie Farrell |
| who finished in position: | 6, with
1862.7
matchpoints (46.97%)
|
Board 17 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | 1010 |
| Earning you: | 135.8
matchpoints (80.83%)
|
| You played against: | Marie Henderson and
Sally Shaw |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
1972.6
matchpoints (49.74%)
|
Board 18 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | -490 |
| Earning you: | 8.3
matchpoints (4.94%)
|
| You played against: | Marie Henderson and
Sally Shaw |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
1972.6
matchpoints (49.74%)
|
Board 19 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | 450 |
| Earning you: | 122.3
matchpoints (72.84%)
|
| You played against: | Marie Henderson and
Sally Shaw |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
1972.6
matchpoints (49.74%)
|
Board 20 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | 620 |
| Earning you: | 52.9
matchpoints (31.51%)
|
| You played against: | Marie Henderson and
Sally Shaw |
| who finished in position: | 4, with
1972.6
matchpoints (49.74%)
|
Board 21 (Dealer: N, Vulnerable: N-S)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 34.2
matchpoints (20.37%)
|
| You played against: | Corrie Overdevest and
Susan Ker |
| who finished in position: | 2, with
2446.2
matchpoints (61.68%)
|
Board 22 (Dealer: E, Vulnerable: E-W)
| Your score on this board was: | -110 |
| Earning you: | 70.5
matchpoints (45.96%)
|
| You played against: | Corrie Overdevest and
Susan Ker |
| who finished in position: | 2, with
2446.2
matchpoints (61.68%)
|
Board 23 (Dealer: S, Vulnerable: All)
| Your score on this board was: | -140 |
| Earning you: | 46.2
matchpoints (35.48%)
|
| You played against: | Corrie Overdevest and
Susan Ker |
| who finished in position: | 2, with
2446.2
matchpoints (61.68%)
|
Board 24 (Dealer: W, Vulnerable: Nil)
| Your score on this board was: | -100 |
| Earning you: | 8.3
matchpoints (6.36%)
|
| You played against: | Corrie Overdevest and
Susan Ker |
| who finished in position: | 2, with
2446.2
matchpoints (61.68%)
|