X-Def 04

Here is a fine example, from a recent match point session, of good and bad opening leads, and good and bad defence. As well as good and bad bidding.

Dealer East EW Vul

	T743 Q8 A7652 J3
AQJ2 KT64 QJ T86		K8 A972 K843 K75
	965 J53 T9 AQ942

The wonderful thing about bridge is that there are always so many different outcomes in any one deal, depending on the skills and bridge knowledge of the participants. This deal provided opportunities for everyone.

Firstly, let’s look at the bidding. East should open 1NT (12-14). West has the points for game but with two four card majors should bid Stayman, 2C. East shows the hearts and should end up in 4H. Some Wests may be either too lazy or too optimistic and bid a direct 3NT rather than look for a heart fit. That did happen a few times so there were two different game contracts, 4H and 3NT.

Before we analyse the defence against both 3NT and 4H, let’s look at the opening leads. What would YOU, as South, lead against a) 4H or b) 3NT given the two possible bidding sequences I have suggested.

Readers are welcome to send me their answers (at vilyn@xtra.co.nz) and reasons before reading the next chapter.