Vil Gravis's blog

What & Why (19)

Let me quote from earlier: “There is of course no ‘correct’ answer every time a bidding or play problem arises, otherwise the game wouldn’t be much fun, but maybe we can all learn something each time we are faced with a problem, if not at the table then in retrospect.”
These are the full hands as they were when this deal came up some time ago in teams play.

Dealer E NS Vul

AJ87
732
QJ
KJ65
6542
98
A8
87432
Q3
KJT654
T743
A
KT9
AQ
K9652
QT9

There were varied suggestions as to the best approach in 3NT, mostly ‘diamonds has best prospects, so play them first’, or ‘finesse spades and play West for the queen’, without any detailed specifics as to the play, but I will quote two panelists who would have made 3NT with overtricks as the cards lay.

What & Why (18)

Here is the full deal that brought about our previous questions and answers. There can be, of course, no ‘correct’ answer every time a bidding or play problem arises; otherwise the game wouldn’t be much fun. But maybe we can all learn something each time we are faced with a problem - if not at the table then in retrospect. These are the full hands as they were when this deal came up some time ago in teams play.

Dealer E NS Vul

AJ87
732
QJ
KJ65
6542
98
A8
87432
Q3
KJT654
T743
A
KT9
AQ
K9652
QT9

What & Why (17)

A continuing theme. This was another problem that came up, with a similar theme to earlier. This one was somewhat different because declarer did not have the luxury of being able to duck the first round of the danger suit. Let me show you the two hands as they were this time. Similar, but quite different.

1. TEAMS. Dealer E NS Vul
North

AJ87
763
QJ
KJ65

South
KT9
AQ
K9652
QT9

EAST opens a weak 2H
Here are some things to consider.
1. Would you have bid 2NT or passed? Or doubled?
2. If you had doubled the 2H opening, what should your partner then bid?
3. If you passed and partner then doubled, would you then bid 3NT or something else?

Another Exercise

Teams, Dealer East. NS VUL.
East opens 2H (weak two)
Sitting South you hold:

KT9
AQ
K9652
QT9

What do you bid and why?
Please respond to me at villyn@xtra.co.nz asap

What & Why (16)

The answers to the declarer play problems in W&W15 told me that there is a big difference between Open players and Intermediates and Juniors, and also between TEAMS and MATCH POINT thinking. Let’s take another look at the problems presented and look at these differences in a way that the advancing players can understand and use to improve their play to the standard that all our open players showed by their answers.

1. TEAMS. Dealer S All Vul

Q4
AQ2
QJ652
QT9
AJ72
76
KT9
KJ65

What & Why (15)

Two declarer play problems in this issue. You are WEST each time.

1. TEAMS. Dealer S All Vul

Q4
AQ2
QJ652
QT9
AJ72
76
KT9
KJ65

SouthWestNorthEast
2PassPassX
Pass3NTPassPass

North leads the KH. Plan your play.

What & Why (14)

The following deal came up in a recent match point session. When you see the full deal you may not believe the bidding but whatever the case, there are a lot of lessons to be learnt, which is why I set it as a progressive exercise for our panel of advanced and advancing players. Here is the full deal so the reader can appreciate all the ramifications.

Dealer N NS Vul

5
852
KQ63
KQT95
KT842
QT3
8
J842
973
AJ94
JT954
A
AQJ6
K76
A72
763

What & Why (13a): Unintended Consequences

4
AQ92
J
AKQJT83

So much for lateral thinking. I have always been of the opinion that bridge is not a game just about learning a set of rules and methods but also a game where imagination and lateral thinking is required.

... and the one after that ..

Vil says .. Hi, hope you’re up for another ‘progressive’ exercise. This time it is a match point session.
You are South and hold the following hand:

5
852
KQ63
KQT95

At favourable vulnerability you pass as dealer. West passes and partner opens 1NT (12-14). East bids 2S. No alert. You do not play Lebensohl or anything fancy in this situation. Your bid?

What & Why (13)

The following deal occurred recently, and provided a very interesting bidding exercise which was presented to our panel as a progressive exercise, starting with the following bidding problem: In a teams match, your partner opens 1S and this is the hand that you have been dealt.

4
AQ92
J
AKQJT83

Syndicate content